Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and also case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
It is additionally important to note that granting of seniority to some civil servant without the actual size of service nearly violates the entire service composition as being a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention of your law nor on the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of the boy or Woman usually do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they can Lower off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner must go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these an appeal hasn't still been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may perhaps then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid of your Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, the decision in the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. Read more
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is hassle-free for a Judge to dismiss the suit click here for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has achieved to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has achieved this sort of stage. Read more
Some bodies are presented statutory powers to issue advice with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police should be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the legislation laid down from the Supreme Court while in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority from the parent department of the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount on the petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Any court may search for to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this type of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of law.
Criminal cases During the common legislation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.